December 11, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
by David Ditch / Tribune Content Agency
This holiday season, working families across America are struggling through the worst bout of inflation in decades. A typical household has lost more than $7,000 in purchasing power since January 2021 due to prices rising faster than incomes.
The primary cause of this inflation has been dramatic increases in federal spending — financed through excessive borrowing and unprecedented money printing. Washington’s spending spree has added more than $50,000 in debt for every household in the country since the pandemic began in March 2020.
Republicans campaigned aggressively on fighting inflation, a message that helped flip enough seats to change control of the House of Representatives. Unfortunately, both chambers of Congress are considering choices that would make things worse.
A prime example of fiscal irresponsibility is the return of federal earmark spending, where elected officials in Washington use taxpayers’ money to subsidize pet projects.
Rather than focusing on national priorities, most federal earmarks go toward special interests. Incumbents expect “bringing home the bacon” will help them when the next re-election rolls around.
Earmarks were banned in 2011, largely due to public backlash against absurdities such as the “Bridge to Nowhere” in Alaska. However, Congress brought earmarks back earlier this year.
Congress is working on a massive spending package to fund federal agencies through September 2023. Unless something changes, earmarks will be part of the agreement.
Examples from this year’s legislation include $1.5 million to encourage people to eat outside in sunny Pasadena, Calif.; $1.1 million for a solar energy array in cloudy Kirkland, Wash.; $2 million for Baltimore’s “Great Blacks in Wax” museum; $44,000 per resident for water infrastructure on the tiny island of St. George, Alaska; and $3.6 million for a Michelle Obama Trail in Georgia.
The larger question is not whether these local projects are good or bad. It’s whether they should be federally funded, particularly at a time of steep budget deficits.
With the national debt now up to an eye-watering $31.4 trillion, or about $240,000 per household, getting rid of pork spending should be a no-brainer.
Despite this, in late November House Republicans voted overwhelmingly against a proposal that would ban earmarks in the GOP conference rules. Starting next year, this would have prevented earmarks in the newly Republican-controlled House.
If Republicans don’t have the stomach to cut pork spending, that doesn’t bode well for their willingness to make the tough budget choices necessary to bring inflation under control.
The House does not have sole responsibility for cleaning up this mess. Senators also have an opportunity to block irresponsible spending before the end of the year. If just 41 senators refuse to sign off on another round of unnecessary spending increases, it will be possible to delay the funding debate until next year.
However, a handful of senators might reach a behind-the-scenes deal. In that case, Congress would likely move ahead with a bloated year-end package that includes earmarks, inflationary spending hikes, and thousands of pages of unrelated riders that exemplify the dysfunctional culture.
Americans deserve to have elected representatives treat their hard-earned taxpayer dollars with respect. Congress should cut earmark pork out of the national diet, prioritize spending to reach financial sustainability, and produce a budget that brings the debt and inflation under control.
That would be a holiday miracle.
David Ditch is a policy analyst in The Heritage Foundation’s Hermann Center for the Federal Budget.
Tribune Content Agency
Copyright © 2022, Chattanooga Times Free Press, Inc.
All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Times Free Press, Inc.
Material from the Associated Press is Copyright © 2022, Associated Press and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and noncommercial use. The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing. All rights reserved.
