Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature volume 604, pages 474–478 (2022)
123
Metrics details
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has exploded in interest as new technologies have opened up a multitude of applications1,2,3,4,5,6, with stereolithography a particularly successful approach4,7,8,9. However, owing to the linear absorption of light, this technique requires photopolymerization to occur at the surface of the printing volume, imparting fundamental limitations on resin choice and shape gamut. One promising way to circumvent this interfacial paradigm is to move beyond linear processes, with many groups using two-photon absorption to print in a truly volumetric fashion3,7,8,9. Using two-photon absorption, many groups and companies have been able to create remarkable nanoscale structures4,5, but the laser power required to drive this process has limited print size and speed, preventing widespread application beyond the nanoscale. Here we use triplet fusion upconversion10,11,12,13 to print volumetrically with less than 4 milliwatt continuous-wave excitation. Upconversion is introduced to the resin by means of encapsulation with a silica shell and solubilizing ligands. We further introduce an excitonic strategy to systematically control the upconversion threshold to support either monovoxel or parallelized printing schemes, printing at power densities several orders of magnitude lower than the power densities required for two-photon-based 3D printing.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
204,58 €
only 4,01 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The code used in this manuscript is supplied in Supplementary Data 1 and 2.
MacDonald, E. & Wicker, R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science 353, aaf2093 (2016).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Gladman, A. S., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L. & Lewis, J. A. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15, 413–418 (2016).
ADS PubMed Article CAS Google Scholar
Anscombe, N. Direct laser writing. Nat. Photon. 4, 22–23 (2010).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Geng, Q., Wang, D., Chen, P. & Chen, S.-C. Ultrafast multi-focus 3-D nano-fabrication based on two-photon polymerization. Nat. Commun. 10, 2179 (2019).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Cumpston, B. H. et al. Two-photon polymerization initiators for three-dimensional optical data storage and microfabrication. Nature 398, 51–54 (1999).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Hong, S. et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv. Mater. 27, 4035–4040 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Ligon, S. C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M. & Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 117, 10212–10290 (2017).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Xiong, W. et al. Simultaneous additive and subtractive three-dimensional nanofabrication using integrated two-photon polymerization and multiphoton ablation. Light: Sci. Appl. 1, e6 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
LaFratta, C. N. & Li, L. in Three-Dimensional Microfabrication Using Two-Photon Polymerization (ed. Baldacchini, T.) 221–241 (Elsevier, 2016).
Singh-Rachford, T. N. & Castellano, F. N. Photon upconversion based on sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2560–2573 (2010).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Ravetz, B. D. et al. Photoredox catalysis using infrared light via triplet fusion upconversion. Nature 565, 343–346 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Mongin, C., Garakyaraghi, S., Razgoniaeva, N., Zamkov, M. & Castellano, F. N. Direct observation of triplet energy transfer from semiconductor nanocrystals. Science 351, 369–372 (2016).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. W. & Castellano, F. N. Photochemical upconversion: the primacy of kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 4062–4072 (2014).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Nishimura, N. et al. Photon upconversion from near-infrared to blue light with TIPS-anthracene as an efficient triplet–triplet annihilator. ACS Mater. Lett. 1, 660–664 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Meinardi, F. et al. Quasi-thresholdless photon upconversion in metal–organic framework nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 19, 2169–2177 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Awwad, N., Bui, A. T., Danilov, E. O. & Castellano, F. N. Visible-light-initiated free-radical polymerization by homomolecular triplet-triplet annihilation. Chem 6, 3071–3085 (2020).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Limberg, D., Kang, J.-H. & Hayward, R. Triplet-triplet annihilation polymerization (TTAP) for high resolution 3D printing. American Physical Society Meeting Vol. 66 abstract C08.00009 (2021).
Dzebo, D., Börjesson, K., Gray, V., Moth-Poulsen, K. & Albinsson, B. Intramolecular triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion in 9,10-diphenylanthracene oligomers and dendrimers. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 23397–23406 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Monguzzi, A., Mezyk, J., Scotognella, F., Tubino, R. & Meinardi, F. Upconversion-induced fluorescence in multicomponent systems: steady-state excitation power threshold. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195112 (2008).
ADS Article CAS Google Scholar
McGlynn, S. P., Reynolds, M. J., Daigre, G. W. & Christodoyleas, N. D. The external heavy-atom spin-orbital coupling effect. III. Phosphorescence spectra and lifetimes of externally perturbed naphthalenes. J. Phys. Chem. 66, 2499–2505 (1962).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Chung, D. S. et al. High mobility organic single crystal transistors based on soluble triisopropylsilylethynyl anthracene derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 524–530 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Kwon, O. S., Kim, J.-H., Cho, J. K. & Kim, J.-H. Triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion in CdS-decorated SiO2 nanocapsules for sub-bandgap photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 318–325 (2015).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Yang, T., Feng, W. & Li, F. Blue-emissive upconversion nanoparticles for low-power-excited bioimaging in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5390–5397 (2012).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Sanders, S. N., Gangishetty, M. K., Sfeir, M. Y. & Congreve, D. N. Photon upconversion in aqueous nanodroplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9180–9184 (2019).
PubMed Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Highly photostable near-IR-excitation upconversion nanocapsules based on triplet–triplet annihilation for in vivo bioimaging application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 9883–9888 (2018).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Jo, S. & Park, K. Surface modification using silanated poly(ethylene glycol)s. Biomaterials 21, 605–616 (2000).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ma, Y. Nitroxides in Mechanistic Studies: Ageing of Gold Nanoparticles and Nitroxide Transformation in Acids Ch. 3, PhD thesis, Univ. York (2010).
Gong, H., Beauchamp, M., Perry, S., Woolley, A. T. & Nordin, G. P. Optical approach to resin formulation for 3D printed microfluidics. RSC Adv. 5, 106621–106632 (2015).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ahn, D., Stevens, L. M., Zhou, K. & Page, Z. A. Rapid high-resolution visible light 3D printing. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1555–1563 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Thingiverse.com. #3DBenchy – the jolly 3D printing torture-test by CreativeTools.se by CreativeTools; https://www.3dbenchy.com
Matheu, M., Busby, E. & Borglin, J. Human organ and tissue engineering: advances and challenges in addressing the medical crisis of the 21st century https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Human-Organ-and-Tissue-Engineering-%3A-Advances-and-Matheu-Busby/5c18783fca0cd38708ad4933784bbdb9554111df (2018).
Chu, W. et al. Centimeter-height 3D printing with femtosecond laser two-photon polymerization. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3, 1700396 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Saha, S. K. et al. Scalable submicrometer additive manufacturing. Science 366, 105–109 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Stepuk, A. et al. Use of NIR light and upconversion phosphors in light-curable polymers. Dent. Mater. 28, 304–311 (2012).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Liu, R., Chen, H., Li, Z., Shi, F. & Liu, X. Extremely deep photopolymerization using upconversion particles as internal lamps. Polym. Chem. 7, 2457–2463 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Méndez-Ramos, J., Ruiz-Morales, J. C., Acosta-Mora, P. & Khaidukov, N. M. Infrared-light induced curing of photosensitive resins through photon up-conversion for novel cost-effective luminescent 3D-printing technology. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 801–806 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sun, T. et al. Integrating temporal and spatial control of electronic transitions for bright multiphoton upconversion. Nat. Commun. 10, 1811 (2019).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Rocheva, V. V. et al. High-resolution 3D photopolymerization assisted by upconversion nanoparticles for rapid prototyping applications. Sci. Rep. 8, 3663 (2018).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, Z., He, S., Butt, H.-J. & Wu, S. Photon upconversion lithography: patterning of biomaterials using near-infrared light. Adv. Mater. 27, 2203–2206 (2015).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Darani, M. K., Bastani, S., Ghahari, M., Kardar, P. & Mohajerani, E. NIR induced photopolymerization of acrylate-based composite containing upconversion particles as an internal miniaturized UV sources. Prog. Org. Coat. 104, 97–103 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Liu, R., Zou, X., Xu, Y., Liu, X. & Li, Z. Deep thiol-ene photopolymerization using upconversion nanoparticle-assisted photochemistry. Chem. Lett. 45, 1054–1056 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Demina, P. et al. Polymerization assisted by upconversion nanoparticles under NIR light. Molecules 24, 2476 (2019).
CAS PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Spatially confined photoexcitation with triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion. Chem. Commun. 57, 9044–9047 (2021).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Kelly, B. E. et al. Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 363, 1075–1079 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Loterie, D., Delrot, P. & Moser, C. High-resolution tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Nat. Commun. 11, 852 (2020).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Regehly, M. et al. Xolography for linear volumetric 3D printing. Nature 588, 620–624 (2020).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Goto, K. et al. Intermolecular oxidative annulation of 2-aminoanthracenes to diazaacenes and aza[7]helicenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10333–10336 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Sanders, S. N. et al. Intramolecular singlet fission in oligoacene heterodimers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3373–3377 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Chung, D. S. et al. High mobility organic single crystal transistors based on soluble triisopropylsilylethynyl anthracene derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 524–530 (2010).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Speckbacher, M., Yu, L. & Lindsey, J. S. Formation of porphyrins in the presence of acid-labile metalloporphyrins: a new route to mixed-metal multiporphyrin arrays. Inorg. Chem. 42, 4322–4337 (2003).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Download references
S.N.S. acknowledges the support of the Arnold O. Beckman Postdoctoral Fellowship. M.S. acknowledges financial support through a Doc.Mobility Fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no. P1SKP2 187676). A.O.G. acknowledges the support of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE-1656518 and a Stanford Graduate Fellowship in Science & Engineering (SGF) as a Scott A. and Geraldine D. Macomber Fellow. We thank C. J. Brinker from the University of New Mexico and S. Kommera from Stanford University for their helpful discussions, V. A. Lifton from Evonik for supplying the Aerosil 200, and A. Sellinger and A. Lim from Colorado School of Mines for performing the TGA experiments. This research is financed through the support of the Rowland Fellowship at the Rowland Institute at Harvard University, the Harvard PSE Accelerator Fund and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Portions of this work were performed at: the Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure Network (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF award no. 1541959; the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-2026822; the Stanford ChEM-H Macromolecular Structure Knowledge Center. The STL file for 3DBenchy – The jolly 3D printing torture-test by CreativeTools.se by CreativeTools is licensed under the Creative Commons – Attribution – No Derivatives license. The image of the gear we present in Fig. 4 and Extended Data Fig. 2 was reproduced with permission from Alamy Inc./Natalia Lukiianova.
These authors contributed equally: Samuel N. Sanders, Tracy H. Schloemer
Rowland Institute at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Samuel N. Sanders, Tracy H. Schloemer, Mahesh K. Gangishetty, Daniel Anderson, Michael Seitz, R. Christopher Stokes & Daniel N. Congreve
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Tracy H. Schloemer, Michael Seitz, Arynn O. Gallegos & Daniel N. Congreve
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
D.N.C. and S.N.S. conceived the project. S.N.S., D.A., M.K.G. and T.H.S. developed the UCNCs. M.K.G. conducted the microscopy characterization of UCNCs. D.N.C., S.N.S. and T.H.S. developed the 3D printing resins. D.N.C., M.S., A.O.G. and R.C.S. constructed the 3D printers and optical setups. T.H.S. and A.O.G. generated the parts presented in this manuscript. D.N.C. directed the project.
Correspondence to Daniel N. Congreve.
Harvard University has filed several patents on the basis of this work. S.N.S., R.C.S. and D.N.C. are co-founders of Quadratic3D, Inc. S.N.S. is the Chief Technological Officer, D.N.C. is the Chief Scientific Advisor and R.C.S. is an advisor to Quadratic3D, Inc.
Nature thanks Christophe Moser and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
a, TEM of the UCNCs. The scale bar represents a length of 50 nm. b, Absorption spectra of the annihilators used in this work. c, Photograph of UCNCs dispersed in water with and without the addition of MPEG-Silane. A precipitate rapidly forms (<1 h) in the vial without MPEG-silane, probably owing to nanocapsule aggregation. This aggregation is irreversible. TGA of capsule paste (d) and capsule constituents in nitrogen (e). In panel d, the temperature was held at 100 °C until the capsule paste mass remained constant. f, Emission–absorption overlap between the upconverted emission (Br-TIPS-anthracene), the photoinitiator (Ivocerin) and the light blocker (Sudan I). g, UCNCs and F127 micelles24 dispersed in various solvents. UCNCs and F127 micelles were both synthesized in water and added at a 1:30 ratio to the listed solvents. They were then excited at 635 nm and imaged through a 550-nm short-pass filter. The tap-water sample was dispersed in water directly from the tap and left uncapped for 20 min before taking the image. Acrylic acid and PEGDA were each used to assess capsule durability in acrylate-based monomers for printing resins.
a, Photograph of the FDM printing setup, which moves a laser spot in three dimensions. The original instructions for the FDM printer are found at https://www.kosselplus.com/, with our modifications presented above. Cartoon schematic (b) and photograph (c) of the DMD printing system, which allows for stationary, parallel excitation at one time. d, Cartoon depiction of the UCNC-facilitated printing process using parallel excitation. e, Emission spectra of the light sources used to generate prints (black: 637-nm fibre-coupled laser for the monovoxel excitation printer; red: 625-nm LED for the parallel excitation printer). f, The file images projected by the DMD to print the Stanford University logo and gear presented in the main text.
a, Formlabs print simulation of the same Benchy STL. The file was imported into the free software PreForm 3.18.0 and simulated for printing on a Form 3B printer at 50-μm layer height. The boat was scaled to match the dimensions of the Benchy printed on our printer. The boat, without support structures, required 200 layers and 0.14 ml of resin. At this point, we used the ‘one-click-print’ function to generate the printable structure with support structure. This resulted in an object with 289 layers at 50-μm layer height, using 0.85 ml of resin. The STL file image (b) and a photograph (c) of the Harvard University logo presented in Supplementary Video 3. The Harvard University logo presented here was printed using a different resin formulation with bis(5-2,4-cylcopentadien-1-yl)-bis(2,6-difluoro-3-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-phenyl) titanium (titanocene, Gelest) as a photoinitiator instead of Ivocerin. This resin was prepared with 1.9 wt% Aerosil 200, 3 wt% titanocene, 13 wt% Br-TIPS-anthracene capsules, 0.03 wt% Sudan I and 5 ppm TEMPO. This resin formulation limited printing resolution,hence the emphasis on the use of the resin presented in the main text and Methods. d–f Side-by-side comparisons of the STL file schematic to the corresponding Benchy photograph from the same perspective. The boats presented in panels d-f were printed using the resin formulation described in the Methods section. g, A representative image of a gear under the microscope shows that round and straight features are generally smooth. The images were taken after washing away excess resin and allowing the gear to dry under an ambient atmosphere in the dark. h, An overprinted boat gives a lack of discernable features. i, An underprinted boat shows missing features and damage from the wash process. Both issues are remedied by altering the print speed and irradiation power. The boats presented here were printed using the same resin formulation as the Harvard University logo presented in panel c.
The z distance from the focal point of the voxel in which the printing in the quadratic regime is approximated. We assume an approximately constant illumination profile.
Cartoon depiction (not to scale) of the blurring that occurs between the shape of the upconverted voxel and the photoinitiation in resin caused by absorption of the upconverted light. Although upconverted light generates light in nanocapsules that emits isotropically from a focal point, this light must subsequently be absorbed by the photoinitiator to cause polymerization. This emission and reabsorption introduce a blurring function to the print that is dependent on the Beer–Lambert law for the distance that the light travels before reabsorption.
Supplementary Data 1 Original STL Benchy file This STL file was uploaded to the commercially available software Simplify3D to generate the Benchy print. The STL file for 3DBenchy – The jolly 3D printing torture-test by CreativeTools.se by CreativeTools is licensed under the Creative Commons – Attribution – No Derivatives license.
Supplementary Data 2 Edited STL Benchy file This gcode file was used to generate the Benchy print presented in this manuscript. The STL file was imported into the software Simplify3D, the dimensions of Benchy were scaled and exported as a gcode file to control the monovoxel excitation printer. The height of the original STL file was adjusted to account for the refractive index of the resin.
Supplementary Video 1 Resin viscosity comparison A relative viscosity comparison of resin with Aerosil 200 (R, right/bottom cuvette) with PETA (P, left/top cuvette).
Supplementary Video 2 Monovoxel excitation printer time-lapse video This time-lapse video demonstrates the monovoxel-excitation-based printing of Benchy using the Br-TIPS-anthracene annihilator-based resin. The photograph at the end of the video shows representative contents of a cuvette containing the Benchy print, along with uncured resin to be later washed off of the print. The actual time to generate the print is 1 h 50 min.
Supplementary Video 3 Harvard University logo printed with the monovoxel printer This video shows the front and profile views of the Harvard University logo printed inside a 1-cm-path-length polystyrene cuvette using monovoxel-excitation-based printing.
Supplementary Video 4 Parallel excitation printer time-lapse video This time-lapse video demonstrates the DMD-based printing of a gear with the TIPS-anthracene annihilator-based resin, with a photograph at the end showing the contents of the Petri dish after a print. The actual time to generate the print is 8 min.
Reprints and Permissions
Sanders, S.N., Schloemer, T.H., Gangishetty, M.K. et al. Triplet fusion upconversion nanocapsules for volumetric 3D printing. Nature 604, 474–478 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04485-8
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04485-8
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Advertisement
Advanced search
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
